The RTX 4060 and RX 7600 signify two of crucial GPUs available on the market at this time. Each GPUs fill out the extraordinarily widespread $250–$300 value bracket that, if we’ve realized something from Steam’s Hardware Survey, are essentially the most fascinating value level for PC avid gamers. The best graphics cards would possibly vary in value from $150 to as a lot as $1,500 in concept, however way more individuals are prepared to fork over $300 as an alternative of choosing a high-end or excessive efficiency graphics card. On this faceoff, we’ll uncover which GPU is the best choice.
The Nvidia RTX 4060 supplies the bottom entry level into its Ada Lovelace RTX 40-series GPU product stack proper now. When it arrived final 12 months, it arrived with a constructive twist by being $30 cheaper than the earlier era RTX 3060 12GB. $30 may not appear to be a lot, but it surely makes the RTX 4060 the primary and solely RTX 40-series GPU (thus far) to undercut its predecessor in value. We counseled the RTX 4060’s glorious energy effectivity, although we weren’t as happy with the regression to a 128-bit bus and 8GB of reminiscence, noting that in observe the GPU feels extra like a alternative for the RTX 3050 8GB than it is beefier 3060 sibling.
The AMD RX 7600 can be the bottom SKU in Crew Pink’s product stack. The RX 7600 had a wierd launch, as AMD initially priced the GPU at $300, however nearly instantly after Nvidia’s RTX 4060 announcement (which included the cardboard’s $299 MSRP), the official launch value dropped to $269 to raised compete with Nvidia. It was a obligatory value reduce as in any other case the matchup would have been decidedly one-sided, and we famous the relatively lackluster efficiency in our evaluate. AMD barely moved the needle within the efficiency division in comparison with the prior era RX 6650 XT, and even now the RX 7600 appears like a glorified RDNA 2 card relatively than a real budget-mainstream successor to the RX 6600.
To learn the way the RTX 4060 and RX 7600 stack up, we’ll take a look at efficiency, value, options, know-how, software program, and energy effectivity — so as of typically lowering significance. Then we’ll render a verdict on this mainstream / finances shootout — sadly, each AMD and Nvidia have successfully deserted the true finances vary of devoted graphics playing cards this era.
RTX 4060 vs RX 7600: Efficiency
Picture 1 of 4
The RTX 4060 wins by a landslide in our gaming benchmarks. Nvidia’s GPU is eighteen% sooner in our 19-game geomean end result at 1080p extremely, and 42% sooner in our ray tracing 8-game geomean. The one sport choice the place the AMD GPU confirmed aggressive energy was in our 11-game rasterization geomean, however even right here the Nvidia card edges the AMD GPU by 3%.
The efficiency delta solely will get worse for the RX 7600 as decision will increase. At 1440p, the RTX holds a lead of 21% in our 19-game general rating, with a 49% lead in ray tracing efficiency and a 4% lead in rasterization outcomes. Neither GPU compes near clearing 60 fps throughout our whole check suite at 1440p, however a lot of the video games stay fairly playable — and people who do not (like Cyberpunk 2077 and Shiny Reminiscence Infinite) will significantly profit from DLSS (or FSR 2) upscaling.
4K extremely gaming is not the first use case for GPUs of this caliber, and it exhibits. Whereas the RTX 4060 takes a large 55% lead general, with a 132% victory in ray tracing efficiency and a 16% lead in rasterization video games, solely a couple of third of the video games may even break 30 fps at our check settings on the RTX 4060 — and solely 5 video games break that barrier on the RX 7600. Clearly, native 4K gaming isn’t a essential decision for these mainstream GPUs, however we embrace the outcomes for consistency’s sake, in addition to to point out simply how a lot graphics horsepower 4K gaming requires lately.
The one shiny spot for AMD’s RX 7600, in the event you can name it that, comes with our 1080p medium check outcomes. This represents the alternative finish of the spectrum from 4K extremely, and nearly every thing ought to run nicely — although ray tracing as common can nonetheless tax these mainstream playing cards. Right here the RTX 4060 ‘solely’ wins by 11% general, with a 33% lead in ray tracing video games. However the RX 7600 does eke out a 3% lead within the rasterization check suite.
Diving into the person sport outcomes, a lot of the video games favor the Nvidia RTX 4060 GPU. That is unsurprising, significantly when almost half of our benchmarking suite consists of ray tracing titles. Nonetheless, once we take a look at rasterized-only video games the RX 7600 stays aggressive — particularly in titles which can be AMD-sponsored.
In our testing, specializing in the 1080p extremely outcomes, Borderlands 3 is the one main AMD victory. It is an AMD-sponsored sport that has at all times favored Crew Pink {hardware}, and it runs 23% sooner on the RX 7600 than the RTX 4060. A Plague Story: Requiem and Flight Simulator additionally give AMD slightly below a 4% lead, with a number of different video games which can be successfully tied. Exterior of the ray tracing video games, which universally favor the 4060 by wherever from 7% (Metro Exodus Enhanced) to 118% (Minecraft with full path tracing), the rasterization video games that extra strongly favor the RTX 4060 embrace Forza Horizon 5 (23%), Whole Conflict: Warhammer 3 (19%), Far Cry 6 (15%), and Murderer’s Creed Mirage (11%).
Based mostly purely on efficiency, though each GPUs come outfitted with 8GB of VRAM on a 128-bit reminiscence bus, Nvidia clearly comes out as the general winner for video games.
Picture 1 of 2
What about outdoors of video games, like in skilled and AI workloads? Right here the RTX 4060 runs away from the RX 7600 in our Steady Diffusion and Blender benchmark outcomes. It is about double the efficiency in Steady Diffusion picture era, and shut to a few instances as quick (175% sooner) in Blender 3D rendering.
SPECviewperf 2020 v2 does flip the tables, nevertheless. The RX 7600 comes out 82% sooner in our general geometric imply rating (which supplies equal weighting to every of the eight sub-tests). The one app that barely favors the RTX 4060 is Maya 06, the place Nvidia’s GPU comes out 12% sooner than the 7600. However skilled and even AI workloads typically do not signify the most certainly use circumstances for mainstream GPUs, so we weight the gaming efficiency a lot heavier.
Total Efficiency Winner: Nvidia RTX 4060
Total, the RTX 4060 simply wins the efficiency battle. At worst (1080p medium), the RTX 4060 matches the RX 7600 in rasterized video games. All over the place else, it begins to open up a decently massive hole. As mainstream GPUs, 1080p extremely represents the most certainly use case, and the 4060 can easily run video games with ray tracing the place the RX 7600 can’t. 3D rendering and AI additionally significantly favors the Nvidia GPU, with the latter being arguably extra essential in the long run. SPECviewperf does give AMD it is sole victory, and albeit it would not rely for a lot as most professionals will use sooner skilled GPUs. The broader assist for DLSS, together with its superior picture constancy, solely serve to widen the efficiency hole.
RTX 4060 vs RX 7600: Value
Whereas efficiency clearly favors the RTX 4060, RX 7600 wins arms down on pricing, not less than when wanting on the uncooked greenback value. AMD formally set the launch value of the RX 7600 at $269, however avenue costs at present begin at $259, with six completely different AIB (add-in board) accomplice playing cards accessible at that value.
Nvidia hasn’t dropped the value on the RTX 4060 — formally or unofficially — so it is nonetheless largely a $299 card. There are some cheaper playing cards, just like the PNY RTX 4060 Verto that currently sells for $279 from Dell, however the subsequent closest card is the $293 MSI RTX 4060 Ventus 2X. Typically talking, the 4060 usually begins at $284 based mostly on what we have seen over the previous six months, with the occasional short-term sale.
However it’s not strictly a matter of pricing. Once more, the Nvidia RTX 4060 tends to be about 18% sooner than the RX 7600 on the resolutions and settings that matter most. Based mostly on bang for the buck (FPS per greenback spent), the RTX 4060 tends to return out forward of the RX 7600. Additionally price noting is that energy use tends to be 30W decrease on the Nvidia card, so relying on how typically you play video games throughout a month and the way a lot you pay for energy, that would additionally work out to a number of {dollars} per 12 months.
Value Winner: AMD RX 7600
Should you’re value as a worth metric, Nvidia would possibly technically get the win right here, however for lots of avid gamers, it is a couple of $30 value distinction in favor of AMD’s RX 7600. Contemplate your explicit wants earlier than making a ultimate determination, and the opposite classes inevitably influence the uncooked value matchup. At present costs, nevertheless, the RX 7600 will get the win because the clearly inexpensive card.
RTX 4060 vs RX 7600: Options, Know-how, and Software program
| Graphics Card | RTX 4060 | RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Structure | AD107 | Navi 33 |
| Course of Know-how | TSMC 4N | TSMC N6 |
| Transistors (Billion) | 18.9 | 13.3 |
| Die dimension (mm^2) | 158.7 | 204 |
| SMs / CUs | 24 | 32 |
| GPU Cores (Shaders) | 3072 | 2048 |
| Tensor / AI Cores | 96 | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 32 |
| Increase Clock (MHz) | 2460 | 2655 |
| VRAM Velocity (Gbps) | 17 | 18 |
| VRAM (GB) | 8 | 8 |
| VRAM Bus Width | 128 | 128 |
| L2 / Infinity Cache | 24 | 32 |
| Render Output Models | 48 | 64 |
| Texture Mapping Models | 96 | 128 |
| TFLOPS FP32 (Increase) | 15.1 | 21.7 |
| TFLOPS FP16 (FP8) | 121 (242) | 43.4 |
| Bandwidth (GBps) | 272 | 288 |
| TDP (watts) | 115 | 165 |
| Launch Date | Jul 2023 | Might 2023 |
| Launch Value | $299 | $269 |
| On-line Value | $293 | $260 |
With regards to specs, the RTX 4060 and RX 7600 look comparatively related in a number of key areas. Different areas seemingly favor one or the opposite GPU, however in observe the paper specs do not at all times inform the total story.
Each GPUs include a 128-bit reminiscence interface and 8GB of reminiscence, which typically will get the job carried out at this value level. We’re much less involved with a 128-bit interface and 8GB on a $300 (or much less) graphics card than on the RTX 4060 Ti. Nonetheless, the 128-bit interface and 8GB of VRAM do give the RX 7600 extra issue than on the 4060 — observe how some video games appear to expire of VRAM on AMD’s GPU whereas the Nvidia card nonetheless does okay, which is especially noticeable at 1440p and better the place reminiscence bottlenecks come into play.
This distinction might be attributed to Nvidia’s superior reminiscence compression and maybe drivers. Normally, we discover that Nvidia GPUs carry out like an AMD GPU with roughly 2GB extra reminiscence. Within the case of the RTX 4060 8GB, its reminiscence system behaves like a RX 7600 with 10GB of reminiscence. It is not an ideal approximation, however there are clearly video games in our check suite the place the RTX 4060 does higher with the identical quantity of VRAM and barely much less reminiscence bandwidth.
Curiously, the RX 7600 seemingly presents greater uncooked FP32 teraflops than the RTX 4060. That is as a result of every of the 32 Compute Models on the RX 7600 has 64 shaders, however may also do twice as many FP32 operations per cycle. That provides AMD’s GPU a theoretical 21.7 teraflops versus Nvidia’s 15.1 teraflops… however outdoors of Borderlands 3, we by no means actually see such a weighting in real-world efficiency.
AMD’s RX 7600 additionally presents 64 ROPS (Render Outputs) versus the RTX 4060’s 48 ROPS. And it has 32MB of L3 Infinity Cache in comparison with 24MB of L2 cache. The theoretical benefit factors to AMD, however the sensible benefit appears to favor Nvidia.
There are areas the place AMD falls far in need of Nvidia as nicely. In addition to superior ray tracing efficiency, the RTX 4060 has 121 teraflops of FP16 compute for AI workloads, and double that with FP8 inference. The RX 7600 solely has 43 teraflops of FP16 throughput by comparability. The mix of Nvidia’s newest RT cores plus its fourth era tensor cores are laborious to understate. These options working in tandem enable the RTX 4060 to ship playable framerates in full path-traced video games similar to Minecraft and Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty. The RX 7600 typically comes up quick, and AMD nonetheless treats ray tracing and AI extra as an afterthought than a main characteristic.
Nvidia and AMD have competing upscaling options: DLSS and FSR, respectively. DLSS typically delivers superior picture high quality, however AMD’s FSR has the benefit of having the ability to work on any GPU — not simply AMD {hardware}. Each corporations additionally supply body era know-how, however Nvidia accomplishes this in {hardware} through its Optical Circulate Accelerator whereas AMD does all of the computations on shaders. AMD’s framegen tends to have extra artifacting, and albeit neither answer has confirmed to be a should have characteristic.
On the software program aspect, there are some things price mentioning. Whereas the drivers are comparatively equal between Nvidia and AMD, Nvidia does have extra software program options than AMD, significantly ones which can be AI-focused. These embrace Broadcast, ChatRTX, Reflex, and Video Tremendous Decision, and these are likely to work nicely and combine higher than AMD’s options (the place such issues exists).
Options, Know-how, and Software program Winner: Nvidia
The RTX 4060 wins general for its superior options and know-how. It is not troublesome to see why many individuals gravitate towards Nvidia {hardware}, even at greater costs — there is a much less vocal majority of avid gamers that merely will not trouble something apart from GeForce playing cards. That kind of vendor lock-in can stifle innovation over the lengthy haul, however thus far Nvidia has confirmed extra prepared to exit and create new software program and {hardware} options.
Energy Consumption
RTX 4060 vs RX 7600: Energy Effectivity
Picture 1 of 2
Energy, as hinted at earlier, massively favors the RTX 4060. It is rated for 115W TGP (Whole Graphics Energy), whereas AMD’s RX 7600 has a 165W TBP (Whole Board Energy) score. The 2 are moderately comparable measurements, and in our full check suite, the RTX 4060 — even with a manufacturing unit overclocked Asus card — usually attracts 25–35 watts much less juice. Superior efficiency with higher energy effectivity finally ends up as a double whammy.
The RTX 4060 delivers roughly 20–25 % greater energy effectivity because of Nvidia’s Ada Lovelace GPU structure. The RTX 4060 pulls a measly 125W on common, whereas the RX 7600 pulls roughly 150W on common. The RTX 4060’s energy consumption can be 45W decrease than its RTX 3060 12GB predecessor.
Energy consumption doesn’t actually fluctuate as a lot with these decrease tier GPUs throughout completely different resolutions and settings. Evaluating 1080p medium, 1080p extremely, 1440p extremely, and 4k extremely energy numbers, the RTX 4060 makes use of wherever between 122 to 126 watts throughout our check suite. Among the many particular person video games, the bottom energy (at 1080p RT Medium in Diablo IV) is 87.6W, however the next-lowest energy use was round 110W; most energy use (once more, for a manufacturing unit overclocked card) is available in at 138.6W.
The RX 7600 has common energy use of 156W at 1080p and 1440p, however that drops to 145W at 4K — largely because of reminiscence congestion and generally extraordinarily poor efficiency. Exterior of 4K outcomes, the bottom common energy whereas gaming on the RX 7600 measures 150W, and the best energy use is available in at 159.5W.
Energy Effectivity Winner: Nvidia
Issue within the superior efficiency of the RTX 4060 and its decrease energy use, and general energy effectivity (FPS/W) finally ends up 42% greater at 1080p medium, 54% greater at 1080p extremely, and 58% greater at 1440p extremely — and 87% greater at 4K extremely, not that we might counsel utilizing both card at such settings in fashionable video games.
RTX 4060 vs. RX 7600 Verdict
| Row 0 – Cell 0 | RTX 4060 | RX 7600 |
| Efficiency | x | Row 1 – Cell 2 |
| Value | Row 2 – Cell 1 | x |
| Options, Know-how, Software program | x | Row 3 – Cell 2 |
| Energy and Effectivity | x | Row 4 – Cell 2 |
| Whole | 3 | 1 |
The RTX 4060 and RX 7600 can each deal with most video games at 1080p and medium to excessive settings. They’re going to get the job carried out with out breaking the financial institution, in different phrases. Nonetheless, the RTX 4060 clearly ranks because the superior possibility, with higher general efficiency, options, and energy effectivity. It is undoubtedly price spending the additional $20–$40 for a typical RTX 4060 in comparison with the RX 7600, even when AMD’s card would not value as a lot out the door.
AMD typically competes with Nvidia by providing extra reminiscence and reminiscence bandwidth at most ranges, however that does not occur with the RX 7600. The cuts are deep sufficient that among the shortcomings actually begin to matter, and the RX 7600 barely presents a lot in the way in which of tangible efficiency advantages over the earlier era RX 6650 XT.
We do not hate the RX 7600, although it did charge as one of many top five worst AMD GPUs of all time — that is largely because of the lack of tangible efficiency enhancements. Many would say the RTX 4060 would not enhance a lot over the RTX 3060 both, however that is really not fairly true. Throughout our gaming assessments, the 4060 beats the 3060 12GB by about 20%. That is not a large enchancment, however coupled with the decreased value, new options, and decrease energy use, it is not less than tolerable.
Each greenback counts once you’re a finances GPU, and right here you are higher off spending barely extra for Nvidia’s RTX 4060 than pinching pennies and choosing the RX 7600. Frankly, AMD most likely must low cost the RX 7600 by one other $30 to make it aggressive. It wants to obviously undercut Nvidia’s pricing by a large enough margin to beat the options and energy deficits together with the efficiency deficit.
Because it stands now, the RTX 4060 is the higher card in just about each class. Should you’re useless set on not shopping for an Nvidia GPU, you would be much better off choosing AMD’s earlier era RX 6750 XT at $299, which not less than manages a considerable win in rasterization efficiency, even when it is over three years outdated now. However that is maybe a faceoff for one more day…